Quantcast

Categorized | News

The Truth About Climate Change

Well, Waldo Jaquith has exposed himself as a “changer”. One that has bought into the man-made climate change scam. The “changers” don’t really care that the “science” they believe in is simply scientific “feelings”. I left a comment to Waldo’s post and thought I would share it with those that might miss it on Waldo’s blog. You can see this Waldo’s post here.

Comment to Waldo:

Many of you are probably too young to remember the “overwhelming” majority of scientists back 30 to 40 years ago that said we were headed into another ice age. They shut up after the global temperatures started warming. Then the chicken little “scientists” started the opposite argument. Some were the same that raised the alarm over the ice age. Al Gore seized the opportunity to make millions.

There has been no warming in over a decade. We are, in fact, cooling. Lessons from the ice age teach the alarmists that they are out of time. As the cooling cycle has already begun, people are realizing this is a hoax. A scam. Time is running out to use false science to pass horrific bills that will make them tons of money, so the panic has reached a fevered pitch.

There are exactly ZERO “scientists” that believe man is to blame for climate change that are not making money from saying so.

There are thousands of scientists that are not on the take that say man has no impact on the climate. Or at least no measurable impact.

In my youth, an overwhelming number of scientists claimed cigarettes were actually beneficial to your health. (I wonder how many of these “scientists” are now global warming “scientists.)

Climate scientists are NOT unanimous. Not even close. Waldo left out the most important word that exposes this as a hoax. CONSENSUS. (But he does use the word in connection with evolution.) This word is carefully used in the “global warming” argument. It means that science has nothing to do with this. There is no PROOF, only consensus. Feelings. Emotions. Custom made arguments for emo Democrats.

While I am not a climate scientist, I am a Navy trained Nuclear Engineer and temperature changes and heat transfer calculations are a large part of nuclear science with a lot of parallels and similarities to the whole global warming / climate change theory.

The science I find credible includes arctic core samples that measure the thickness of layers of ice over thousands of years. This proves the normal cycles of warmer and cooler temperatures the earth has experienced in that time. Before Gore even jumped on the bandwagon, we were already cooling again.

The science I do not believe is the alarmists that look at temperature data barely over 100 years and reach the wrong conclusion. If you look at the core samples, the cycles graph to a sine wave. Gore is looking at the rising transition of a sine wave and reaches the wrong conclusion.

By way of example, Gore is looking at the temperature in the desert from 8 AM to noon and calculates an ever increasing temperature that will be hundreds of degrees the next day, ignoring the cooling cycle of the night.

But they go one step further and try to tie the increasing temperature to man-made causes. Specifically, carbon. Why carbon? Because the radical environmentalists want to demonize oil and coal. So this is simply a way to tax it out of favor.

Problem is, CO2 is only a tiny portion of greenhouse gasses, and the man-made portion of this is small. Water vapor comprises 95% of all greenhouse gasses. The climate “scientists” ignore water vapor to make the man-made CO2 sound more significant.

Man-made CO2 accounts for .28% of greenhouse gasses if water vapor is taken into account. That means that 99.72% of greenhouse gasses are natural. Beyond our control.

So, if we reduce man-made CO2 by 10% globally, at a cost of billions of dollars and thousands of jobs, we will reduce man-made CO2 by .03%. This will make absolutely no measurable difference in global temperatures.

However, and here is the cleaver part of the Gore plan, global temperatures will suddenly be seen as declining and Gore will credit Cap and Tax. And the willing press will go along. And ignore the fact that global temperatures have been in decline due to the normal cycle for over a decade.

Consensus is not science. Science is measurable and provable. Anything else is theory. Or worse.

“Changers”, those that believe in man-made climate change, accept hysteria and theory over real science.

When someone tells you that scientific consensus tells us something, what that really means is that they are unable to prove it. Don’t confuse consensus with scientific conclusion. There is no scientific proof that man has anything more than a negligible impact on global temperatures. Short of, perhaps, global nuclear war.

The old saying that everyone complains about the weather, but nobody does anything about it will always be true.

About Tom White

Tom is a US Navy Veteran, owns an Insurance Agency and is currently an IT Manager for a Virginia Distributor. He has been published in American Thinker, currently writes for the Richmond Examiner as well as Virginia Right! Blog.Tom lives in Hanover County, Va and is involved in politics at every level and is a Recovering Republican who has finally had enough of the War on Conservatives in progress with the Leadership of the GOP on a National Level.

6 Responses to “The Truth About Climate Change”

  1. Bigvinu says:

    As we begin the mad cycle from going to the liberal argument that all science is for man's involvement to the conservative argument that all scientists that aren't being paid off are forman not being involved, let's look at the fact that there's a hot contention here.

    I think you're really missing the point by using the ice Age example. Isn't it a scientific aspect to observe data and make conclusions? The validity of your conclusions would probably be based of the time spectrum you're looking at. Well, what amount of time is right? And if you started noticing an alarming pattern, wouldn't that in itself require attention?

    Get it out of your head that it's science's job to be right one way or the other. No. It's sciences job to help peel off more information leading closer and closer to the never possibly reached truth. Obviously there are going to be some that look at the data they've conducted and say that climate change is man made, some will look at the same data and say that that's not the case. Either way, It's not their job or possible to be 100% Accurate.

    Also, obviously man has some role in climate change because on a chemical level what we put out could in theory 9if large enough) cause a green house effect. It then begs the question whether we're producing enough to be the sole cause of this event or is the planet itself causing it. While I don't claim to have the answers (I doubt you or Waldo secretly do either), I think we need to be able to make the logical connection that if the "changers" (as you call it, I'll refer to them as "man-made proponents") are correct, then we should act. If the opposite side is correct, then we still need to act because I doubt the destruction of habitat and hunting grounds, pumping pollutants into the our lungs, dumping toxins into the rivers that we use for our local fish, etc. is a good thing.

    Well, that's just my opinion on it,

  2. Bigvinu says:

    As we begin the mad cycle from going to the liberal argument that all science is for man's involvement to the conservative argument that all scientists that aren't being paid off are forman not being involved, let's look at the fact that there's a hot contention here.

    I think you're really missing the point by using the ice Age example. Isn't it a scientific aspect to observe data and make conclusions? The validity of your conclusions would probably be based of the time spectrum you're looking at. Well, what amount of time is right? And if you started noticing an alarming pattern, wouldn't that in itself require attention?

    Get it out of your head that it's science's job to be right one way or the other. No. It's sciences job to help peel off more information leading closer and closer to the never possibly reached truth. Obviously there are going to be some that look at the data they've conducted and say that climate change is man made, some will look at the same data and say that that's not the case. Either way, It's not their job or possible to be 100% Accurate.

    Also, obviously man has some role in climate change because on a chemical level what we put out could in theory 9if large enough) cause a green house effect. It then begs the question whether we're producing enough to be the sole cause of this event or is the planet itself causing it. While I don't claim to have the answers (I doubt you or Waldo secretly do either), I think we need to be able to make the logical connection that if the "changers" (as you call it, I'll refer to them as "man-made proponents") are correct, then we should act. If the opposite side is correct, then we still need to act because I doubt the destruction of habitat and hunting grounds, pumping pollutants into the our lungs, dumping toxins into the rivers that we use for our local fish, etc. is a good thing.

    Well, that's just my opinion on it,

  3. air optix says:

    I would love to hear more about this topic.

  4. air optix says:

    I would love to hear more about this topic.

Trackbacks/Pingbacks


    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    CommentLuv badge

    Tom White Says:

    Nothing is more conservative than a republican wanting to get their majority back. And nothing is more liberal than a republican WITH a majority.

    Check out NewsMax!

    Sign up for Virginia Right Once Daily Email Digest

    No Spam - ever! We send a daily email with the posts of the previous day. Unsubscribe at any time.
    * = required field

    Submit a Blog Post!

    Submit a Blog Post for our 'Boots on the Ground' feature

    Click Here for Instructions on How to Submit a Post

    Google Ad

    Google Ad

    Follow Us Anywhere!

    Google Ad

    Archives

    Facebook Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
    %d bloggers like this: