Quantcast

Categorized | Opinion

The Iran Deal is an Executive Agreement; Practicalism is Problem

Brian Schoeneman has published a brilliantly written piece over at Bearing Drift entitled, The Iran Deal is not a Treaty, wherein he endeavors to demonstrate that this whole Iran Nuclear Deal really is what the President says it is, an Executive Agreement. He begins his piece by offering up the arguments which he seeks to dispel, not to lay waste to or even criticize these perspectives, but merely to state them, honestly, in the unedited words of those who expressed them. I mention this, I suppose, out of respect for the proper form of argument, which I rarely see anymore these days, but which was executed perfectly in Brian’s piece.

Mr. Schoeneman goes on to detail the legal history and relevant rulings of the courts with regard to Executive Agreements; which is to say, that he explains to us exactly how bizarre and corrupt our government has become, even though, I suspect, that was not his intention. I have a few disagreements with a couple of his premises, but those counter arguments have been made at Bearing Drift by others, and if debating this article interests you, it ought to be debated where it was written.

I suggest that you read the article, because I will not quote it here. Instead, I intend to address a larger problem with the Republican Party which the Schoeneman piece perfectly depicts. This is not a problem that originates with the Republican Party, nor is the GOP Leadership the only group of people guilty of it. The problem is something I refer to as Practicalism. It’s a term I coined in my notes while studying philosophy at Virginia Tech. A term I used to describe something for which I didn’t have a word.

Practicalism is not a philosophy, but rather a way of thinking. I say that it is not a philosophy, because it has no adherence to any set of principles, nor does it necessarily consider principles. Instead, Practicalism is a word I use for people who think in terms, primarily, if not exclusively, of what is “practical”. Practicalism accepts whatever is commonly accepted. It adopts the language, ideas, and “reality” most prevalent within a system, a culture, or within the larger set of ideas, being that which is common. Anything which contradicts that which is commonly accepted is impractical and therefore unreasonable, or so the Practicalists believe.

Another excellent example of what I refer to as Practicalism is the 14th Amendments’ infiltration into every aspect of American Life. The 14th Amendment, written to protect the rights of slaves, freed slaves, and the children of slaves, states in Section 1:

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

Now, the words, “equal protection of the laws” has come to refer to everyone and in almost every circumstance or situation. The Amendment was clearly written to protect African-American slaves and their decedents from mistreatment under the Democrat Rule in The South, or wherever Democrats had amassed power. It was not intended to address the rights of women, homosexuals, diplomats, or illegal aliens. Yet, through the perversions of our Courts, the 14th Amendment has grown in scope and this new scope is now commonly accepted as the only correct interpretation of the amendment. Anything contradicting this popular and modern view of the 14th Amendment is considered to be wrong, by virtue of its’ being impractical.

Soldiers_military_combat_field_dress_uniforms_Iran_Iranian_army_013Republicans don’t want to deport illegal aliens, because it is impractical. It is hard, expensive, and it will hurt business (especially business as usual). Republicans don’t really want to overturn Roe v. Wade, because women have accepted that access to infanticide is a right, and it would be impractical to take away a right to which women have become accustomed. Republicans don’t want to talk about gay marriage, because the Supreme Court ruled on DOMA and “everyone” accepts that gays have the right to marry, and it would be impractical to oppose it. Republicans don’t want to stop Iran from getting the bomb, because most of the world despises Israel anyway and figures that world peace would be greatly increased if there were no Jews in the world; for, as we know, Jews are offensive to Muslims and offending Muslims causes war and war is impractical. Republicans aren’t going to cut back on spending or reduce the debt, because Maryland and Virginia now have economies entirely predicated upon federal government spending, and millions of people would be put out of work, and Maryland’s and Virginia’s economies would be upended, and it would just be all together impractical.

If “everyone” accepts that the President has the right to call a Treaty an Executive Agreement, then it is impractical to oppose it. That is the nature behind the thought of Brian Schoeneman’s piece. Do you really think Brian, or anyone over at Bearing Drift actually likes the Iran Deal? They don’t! Even the idea that because the super wealthy Wall Street and K Street crowds stand to make a fortune off the Iran Treaty, doesn’t mean that men like Brian Schoeneman or Shaun Kenney stand to make a penny off it. In fact, I suspect that neither of them like the Iran Deal. I suspect that most of their principles would lead them to be in utter opposition to the Iran Deal. But principles don’t matter when you are a Practicalist, when you practice Practicalism.

I listened to about 3 minutes of Rush Limbaugh on my way home from work. I listened to Mark Levin’s Friday evening show on my way to work. Even Mark Levin and Rush Limbaugh don’t understand the mindset they are up against. Everyone is looking for a sinister reason, a maleficent motive, an evil at the heart of the Republican Party which has caused it to disappoint so many of us who call ourselves Republicans, or who place our hope in Republican opposition.

It’s not that they are evil.

Mitch McConnell and John Boehner do not believe that it is practical to fight Obama while he is in the White House. It’s hard, difficult, troubling, and impractical. It’s not practical to pass a bill that the President could veto, so they don’t do it. It’s not practical to oppose Welfare or Federal Spending or bureaucratic overreach if most of the American People don’t even know that these things are a problem. It’s impractical. Why fight losing battles? Why take unpopular positions? It’s impractical.

This is why the Republican Party you gave control over the United States Congress is working more closely with President Obama than they are with the citizens that put them into power in the first place. Obama has the real power, not you. Therefore, listening to you is impractical. Working with Obama is practical.

You must understand the way these people think in order to understand why we are where we are. McConnell and Boehner aren’t really evil, even though they enable evil. They accept the world, the system, the rules, the common lexicon, and the common understanding as intrinsically valuable because they are common, because they are accepted. Principles and philosophies are impractical, to them.

So, when it comes right down to it, if Judges, Presidents, and Congressmen all agree that something is what they say it is, then to them, it is just crazy for anyone to challenge it. The majority accept it – deal with it. That is the America you live in. That is just how shallow and thin our thinkers and politicians have become.

Frankly, on some level, I think this is why Trump is so popular. He’s the most impractical man in the game. He just says whatever the majority of people wish was the case, and is riding a wave of unprecedented support. But that’s a topic for another day. This article is already too long and if most people refuse to read an article this long, then you can rest assured that such an article was impractical in the first place!

UPDATE: Shaun Kenney weighs in with the same thinking. Virginia Politics is a whore up for sale. Jeb Bush is willing to purchase us. Bush To Fundraise For Virginia Senate Republicans. Jeb Bush accepts the way our politics works and is working it. Jeb Bush is practical.

 

 

 

 

About Steven Brodie Tucker

Graduated with a degree in Philosophy from Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. Also studied economics and political science at George Mason.

9 Responses to “The Iran Deal is an Executive Agreement; Practicalism is Problem”

  1. Brian Schoeneman
    Twitter:
    says:

    There’s nothing more powerful in Washington than legislative inertia. If these guys don’t want to do something, they will find every excuse not to do it. Let me mull this practicalism thing around a bit. And you’re right – I’m not a fan of this deal.

  2. Steven Brodie Tucker
    Twitter:
    says:

    I know. I understand the difference between arguing that something is what it is and that something ought to be what it is. The question is, if we disagree, what, if anything, are we going to do?

  3. Gene Lefty says:

    Here is a dirty little secret. Obama doesn’t like the Iran deal either. Neither do I. But I am for it.

    So now you all know that we all have something in common. We all do not like the Iran deal.

    But it’s the only deal right now, and only history will tell if it is better than the alternative.

    If there were no AIPAC nor IAPAC money falling out of the sky in DC, we would then know what the Iran deal really is.

    But there is PAC money literally falling from the sky in DC about this deal.

    Wouldn’t it be hilarious if the Iranians now reject the deal after we passed it?

  4. Paula Smith says:

    Hey Gene,

    If the dems are able to ram this bad deal through so we can see what’s in it, please report back & let us know if u r still for it, ok?

    It blows my mind that anyone would like anything Obama is involved with in anyway. He is the most corrupt, unethical, inept, anti-American & debt laden president ever.

    • Gene Lefty says:

      So, are we making some progress here?

      Can I assume from your comment that at least you are willing to admit that Obama is actually President? I mean, like it’s only been almost 7 years now.

      If so, doesn’t that make you a “left winger”?

  5. Robert Shannon says:

    It has been written and spoken about extensively. Unless and until you remove the money from the political process, publically financing elections , any progress in finding solutions will be nil. K Street & Wall St. didn’t accrue this level of influence in a vacuum.

    Why is it that members of Congress and former Presidents net worth climbs through the stratosphere after they leave office ? We all know why. Instead of using their “public service ” as the opportunity to advance remedies they chose to lay the foundation for the wealth grab that occurs after their service.

    Even at the local level the evidence is overwhelming on the track pols take immediately after they are elected. Elected officials at the county/town/municipality start off with grandiose pay raises for local gov’t employees, school employees , knowing it paves the way for their planned trajectory by solidifying a voter base , comprised of these groups who then are solid voting blocks for their next political step on the ladder. Consequences be damned, look at the horrendous amount of debt that is now beginning a cascade of bankruptcies across the Country. Win the Lottery in Illinois, that bastion of fiscal madness and you get paid with an I.O.U. A small town in Kentucky last week filed for Chapter 7 with 10 million in assets & 100 million in liabilities. We’ve uncovered here in King William that tax payers were paying 100% of county employees health insurance costs, to include 3 of the County Supervisors. Who today is getting their health insurance paid 100% by someone else—besides gov’t employees ? Why did this go on for so long ? Elected officials bought their solidly abiding political support with other peoples money. It is that simple. The corruption starts there. As a side, a local developer stuck taxpayers with a $440,000 tab for a flawed water system , expecting to simply walk away with the quiet complicity of the same elected officials who wouldn’t have done a damn thing about it, quietly sweeping it under the rug, had it not been for the local TEA Party group raising so much hell about it. It is now being litigated. Clearly this shows this nefarious conduct can be halted, but only if you have a vigilant and vocal opposition

    The apathy that Steve and others often allude to is maintained by these same culprits massaging the effects of their malfeasance by simply postponing the consequences, stretching out when the populace will take the hit from their misdeeds as long as they can. What do you think extended unemployment and 20 million more on food stamps represents ? The sad irony is by the time we act it will be too late, it will be a cascade of misery, impacting all of us, even those of us who have been diligently trying to stop it.

    Bob Shannon

    • Brian Schoeneman
      Twitter:
      says:

      Their net worth climbs into the stratosphere after they leave office because they now have things that people want and are willing to pay for – whether it’s their presence at speeches or their inside knowledge of the process and access to people.

  6. Paula Smith says:

    The epitome of CORRUPTION!

  7. Robert Shannon says:

    Thank you Brian, excellent points. The media in recent weeks has been remiss in my opinion in not giving more air time to the reports of money given to pols from Iranian sources . It played in a narrow number of media outlets when it should have been covered much more extensively, highlighting these traitorous scumbags. If the U.S or it’s allies are hit in the future by Iranian nukes these folks , among others will be singled out for their scandalous role.

    Bob Shannon

Trackbacks/Pingbacks


    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    CommentLuv badge

    Tom White Says:

    Nothing is more conservative than a republican wanting to get their majority back. And nothing is more liberal than a republican WITH a majority.

    Check out NewsMax!

    Sign up for Virginia Right Once Daily Email Digest

    No Spam - ever! We send a daily email with the posts of the previous day. Unsubscribe at any time.
    * = required field

    Submit a Blog Post!

    Submit a Blog Post for our 'Boots on the Ground' feature

    Click Here for Instructions on How to Submit a Post

    Google Ad

    Google Ad

    Follow Us Anywhere!

    Google Ad

    Archives

    Facebook Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
    %d bloggers like this: