Categorized | News

Controlling the Weather

Global warming, global warming, wherefore art thou?

If man has truly reached the point where he can cause the entire earth to warm by releasing CO2, and we also have the capability to reverse this trend by slowing the release – according to the warmers, then why use punishing means like Cap and Tax to go after people’s money?

You people are obviously a lot smarter than the rest of us, so just use your new found “science” to create a weather machine. As I recall, this thought has already occurred to the Hollywood. Luke and Laura of General Hospital fame suffered from the diabolical effects of just such a weather machine.

The mid-Atlantic states sure could benefit from a good dose of 60 degree weather to help melt this snow.

Too bad all that data was manipulated and totally fraudulent. If it was for real, it would be a huge benefit to mankind.

But then, President Obama would likely give it to our enemies as appeasement and they would use it to melt the polar ice caps, and we would all be screwed.

Maybe we should just wait until 2012 when the Republicans regain the White House and National Security returns to the national lexicon.

In the mean time, has anyone seen my snow shovel?
I know it is around here somewhere.
I just used it last weekend…

About Tom White

Tom is a US Navy Veteran, owns an Insurance Agency and is currently an IT Manager for a Virginia Distributor. He has been published in American Thinker, currently writes for the Richmond Examiner as well as Virginia Right! Blog. Tom lives in Hanover County, Va and is involved in politics at every level and is a Recovering Republican who has finally had enough of the War on Conservatives in progress with the Leadership of the GOP on a National Level.

5 Responses to “Controlling the Weather”

  1. Venu says:

    So Climate Change is proven wrong by the presence of snow? Let’s not talk about any real data that challenges Climate Change, let’s be as narrow minded as possible. “IT’S SNOWING!!!!!”. It also happens to be January, what’s your point?

    There are some valid arguments to be made against Climate Change data, “IT’S SNOWING!!!!!!” is not even a slightly valid one.

    • Tom White says:

      A consensus of fraud detection experts all agree that Man-made Climate Change is a fraud. The science on this is settled.

      Honestly, you couldn’t possibly believe that there is anything to the climate change crap, can you? Jones is about to fall on his sword and the Himalayan Glaciers are not melting. I just booked a trip for 2036, that’s how sure I am.

      These guys have made a mockery of science. And they deserve all the ridicule they get.

      RFK Jr said there would be no more snow in DC. 15 months ago.

      I believe the whole global warming hoax is over.

      Another great post :

      “The global warming movement as we have known it is dead,” the brilliant analyst Walter Russell Mead says in his blog on The American Interest. It was done in by a combination of bad science and bad politics.

      • Venu says:

        Yes, there IS data to your point. But my point is that “It’s Snowing” doesn’t count for anything. Snow can be explained by a multitude of weather patterns, regardless of Climate Change.

        On a side not, Climate Change is an issue to a much broader issue of how we treat the environment. More importantly, if a car full of polluting vehicles doesn’t necessarily hyper-accelerate a Warming pattern, is it necessarily a biologically safe thing to our lungs? Is habitat loss any better for our world because it makes room for the economy?

        • Tom White says:

          Well, my reasoning is that when we have year with higher than normal hurricane activity, global warming was blamed. When we have a few tornadoes, global warming.

          A student theorizes Himalayan Glaciers are going to melt by 2035, and we see a world panic to put policies in place.

          Dutch officials call the IPCC’s bluff that 55% of their country is under water. Actually, it is only 26%.

          My point is, global warming believers are quick to point out that a snow storm does not make global warming false, yet they expect everyone to believe a hurricane proves it. This is a perfect example why most logical people find the global warmers to be not very credible. Anything that can be used as “proof” of AGW is true is exploited no matter how silly it really is. And things that go against their beliefs must be attacked.

          So, when I say an epic snow that is beyond anything ever recorded disproves global warming, there is actually more validity in that statement than a couple of cat 5 hurricanes being caused by global warming.

          But to discount the snow as evidence against global warming, you must also discount the massive amounts of similar information coming from the believers.

          Are you prepared to say that?

          Although I believe you would be more likely to agree with that than most warmers. You do have a lot more intellectual honesty than most on the subject.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CommentLuv badge

Tom White Says:

Nothing is more conservative than a republican wanting to get their majority back. And nothing is more liberal than a republican WITH a majority.

Sign up for Virginia Right Once Daily Email Digest

No Spam - ever! We send a daily email with the posts of the previous day. Unsubscribe at any time.
* = required field

Follow Us Anywhere!